Improving The Quality Of The Written Information Sent To Women About Breast Screening- Evidence-based Criteria For The Content Of Letters And Leaflets -nhsbsp Publication- !!link!! Jun 2026

The result was , a seminal document that deconstructed the friendly invitation letter and the glossy leaflet. It asked a radical question: What if the words we use cause more harm than good?

When NHSBSP Publication No. 55 was released, it caused a firestorm. Radiologists feared that disclosing overdiagnosis would cause attendance rates to plummet. Patient advocates argued that withholding it was a violation of human rights. The result was , a seminal document that

This is the vehicle for personal data and specific appointment details. The guidelines suggest it should be brief, clear, and act as a "warm" welcome. It should provide the date, time, and location, along with clear instructions on how to change or cancel the appointment. The letter serves as the prompt for action. 55 was released, it caused a firestorm

The publication "Improving the Quality of the Written Information Sent to Women about Breast Screening: Guidelines on the Content of Letters and Leaflets" (NHSBSP Publication No 65) provides evidence-based criteria for ensuring that communication with women is clear, balanced, and supports informed choice. These guidelines updated earlier standards (Publication No 38) and focus on specific content requirements for invitation, recall, and result letters. Key Evidence-Based Criteria for Content This is the vehicle for personal data and

Improving the Quality of Written Information for Breast Screening

The NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) outlines evidence-based criteria for written communications to ensure informed decision-making, emphasizing clarity in invitation letters, results, and leaflets regarding benefits and risks. Key recommendations include using simplified language, clearly distinguishing between technical and clinical recalls, and providing balanced information on overdiagnosis to reduce anxiety and improve attendance. For in-depth guidelines, see the full report at

The likelihood of being called back for a "second look," emphasizing that most recalls do not result in a cancer diagnosis. The Impact of Implementation